-
So, the best laid plans to write a regular blog haven’t quite materialised as the last onereviewing the ON cloud Flows was back in January! Well, I guess at least I’ll have plenty towrite about, but I’m determined to make amends for this over the rest of this season!I going to aim to cover a few bases with this post, some which I’ve meaning to do for quite awhile!(i) Follow up the short review of the ON Cloud Flows with a long-term perspective,having now put over 800km (~500miles) into the shoes(ii) Give some thoughts of the newest racing shoe, the ON Cloud Flash(iii) Give my thoughts on the Polar M200 running watch with integrated heart rate(iv) Give an update on my recent training and the start to the 2017 racing seasonON Cloud Flow – Long-term Update:The review I posted about the Cloud Flows was based on around 100km of running, which Ifelt was enough at the time to give a decent perspective to what the shoe was all about andhow it felt…fast forward a few months and I’ve now run over 800km in the same pair(although I do have another identical pair that I use for racing), which, at the time of writingthe last review, I’ll honestly say that I didn’t think I’d get anywhere near this amount of wearout of them. I had already started to see the signs of wear around the heel area of the shoe,and with these shoes being on the ‘lighter’ side of the spectrum, the tendency would be tothink that getting high mileage out of this type of shoe would be impossible – how wrong!Being total honest, these shoes have just got better and better with time. The have becomemore comfortable, the grip has improved and to say that they have been through everyconceivable training scenario throughout this time would be an understatement, with eachtime exceeding my expectations. The wear on the heel cup did continue, but seemed to getto a point where it stopped and didn’t go any further, without causing any issues withblistering after the initial sign of wear. The issues I was experiencing with the grip in damperconditions also improved. Granted, this is still a slight negative with the shoe, as this hasn’ttotally disappeared, but I am certainly a lot more confident in the handling of the shoes inwetter conditions than I was in the first 100km’s. I’m not at the point where in need to retirethese shoes soon, but I really don’t want to…like an old pair of slippers, they feel socomfortable and matched to my feet that I just want to keep on running in them! I’ve certainlyfelt with this shoe, probably more than any of the others in the ON range, that they do take alittle time to ‘break in’, but once you’re there, you’re left with a shoe that is probably the mostversatile and comfortable that I’ve ever worn, and one that will also see you through a greatdeal of mileage, to boot!First thoughts – ON Cloud Flash:This is one FAST shoe! The lightest and most race orientated of ON’s range, this shoe livesup to its name. I’ve been wearing the flash for some quicker training sessions and also onesprint triathlon at Southwell. Although I came second overall this year and missed out on thewin, I posted my fastest run split on the course ever and was beaten by one of GB triathlonsunder 23 elites. After chasing him from the first length of the swim and all the way throughthe bike, I felt like I had nothing left on the run, but somehow pulled out a 10sec run coursePB – no small thanks to the shoes I was wearing, me thinks, as I felt like I was goingbackwards! The Flash are extremely light and they are certainly more racing designed thanany of their shoes in the past, even the Cloud Racer (now re-named the Cloud Rush), whichfeels fairly well cushioned, by comparison! They performed well whilst wearing no socks, too,which is an added bonus. The biggest difference with these shoes, to any of the others isthat the clouds on the outsole are built directly onto a rigid ‘speedboard’. This gives thefeeling of an extremely responsive shoe that just wants to go faster! For me, these shoes willbe for sprint and Olympic distance races. Personally, I currently feel that these are a little toominimal for half distance races, but this may change potentially given the experience of thebreaking in period experienced with the Flows. I’ll follow up more with this when I havetrained and raced more in them.Polar M200 GPS Running Watch with integrated, wrist based Heart Rate:Working in Sport Science, I feel fairly well placed to be able to offer a reasonably well-rounded opinion on a device such as this. I’ve used and experience a whole host of GPSand heart rate monitoring systems over the last 15-years (showing my age now!). Other thanthe introduction of good GPS systems over the last 5-years, probably the most contentiousand hotly debated issues in heart rate monitoring is the use (and reliability) of wrist basedHR sensors, which replace the more traditional chest straps found in most conventionalunits. Wrist based HR monitoring has been about now for a couple of years, and certainly inmy experience, has been a bit hit-and-miss…Of the units I’ve used that have had this feature(Garmin Forerunner 225 and 735XT), I have been unconvinced at the reliability of such afeature – so much so that I have always overridden the wrist HR with a conventional HRstrap. Being someone that uses HR heavily during training and racing, knowing that the datayou are receiving is correct, to be able to execute training effectively in the desired HR zone,is a must and unfortunately, I never felt this was the case with either of the previous units –that is until I used the Polar M200, which is Polars first foray into the wrist HR monitoringmarket. I was very happily surprised to see that the data was spot on form the word go. I rana number of sessions with a trusted chest based system on the opposite wrist, and eachsession the heart rate traces were almost identical. This was the case for both continuoussteady-state sessions and also interval based sessions that involved large variations inpace/effort and concurrent HR response.All in all, I was very pleased with this side of the watch and I would be happy to use this,without any additional chest strap, which really would solve the issue of anyone thatstruggles with wearing a chest strap. Polar seem to have got this nailed! As for the rest of thewatch; it is very easy to use, if a little on the basic side in some cases – but I have beenused to some of the higher spec watches with multi-sport functionality in the past, which mayhave clouded my judgement a little I this respect. Generally, it functions really well for itsdesired purpose, of being a GPS running watch, with good quality wrist based HR. It wasalso very easy to get information off the watch, and into Strava, etc…the Bluetoothconnection was easy to set up, and whenever in range it paired and downloaded to myphone via the Polar Flow app immediately, which makes visualising the data post run,extremely easy – great for checking PB’s on segments and K/QOM’s! The only slight niggle Ihad with the watch during my time using it was that it did take a while to connect to GPS ona couple of occasions, which is slightly frustrating when you’re eager to get a run started.This certainly didn’t detract from the overall positive experience I had whilst using the watch.Certainly a great option for anyone wanting to dip their toe into the world of combined GPSand HR, particularly without using a chest strap. Good work, Polar!Training and Racing update:Rather than regurgitating stuff that I’ve written elsewhere already, the link below contains ablog that I wrote in the week before OSB Events Nottingham Outlaw Half on my own blogsite – I was getting pretty excited about that event as it was my first big 70.3 goal of theseason;
-
https://swimbikerunsi.wordpress.com/2017/05/16/its-been–a–while–time–to–start–to–2017/Picking up where that left off…as it turns out, I didn’t quite have the race that I had hoped for.After a cracking swim, for some reason I just couldn’t get going on the bike and felt flat forthe whole time…pretty frustrating when you can see the race disappearing up the road infront of you…my saving grace, it turned out in this race, was my run, which was totallyunexpected given the poor bike. Racing properly for the first time in the Flows theyperformed excellently throughout and thankfully so did I – running to a sub 1hr 22min halfmarathon split at the end of a 70.3 tri! Not long ago that time wasn’t too far away from my flatout half PB, so it shows just how far my running has come, particularly since running with theLWAC track group over the winter. This certainly gives me confidence going forward that,given a decent bike leg, I can put together something pretty special in the next few races…here’s hoping, anyway!After the half I’ve had a 6-week period of training before my next big race – OSB EventsOutlaw Half Holkham. Writing this, I’m now in my last week of heavy training at the end of abig 3-week block before I start to wind things down in the couple of weeks before the race.Again, I’m going into the race with high hopes, after an AG win and 3rd overall at last year’srace…Before this though I’ll be at Woodhall Spa Sprint Tri on Sunday, which is where I tooka win and new course record last year – let’s see what I’ve got this year!
